Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966

People v. Soman

People v. Soman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 14, 1966
53 Misc. 2d 452; 278 N.Y.S.2d 657; 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1232

Counsel

Benjamin Gollay for appellant. Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney (Michael Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Soman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. In any event it was improper to convict defendant of attempted malicious mischief, a crime with which *453she was not charged. Although a defendant indicted for a felony may be convicted of an attempt to commit such crime, without being specifically charged therewith (Penal Law, § 610), no similar authority is found in the New York City Criminal Court Act with regard to misdemeanors. We disapprove of the loose practice of reducing criminal charges against a defendant and then proceeding to trial ivithout the formality of filing a new complaint or information, and without a new arraignment.

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and complaint dismissed.

Concur — Margett, Schwartzwald and Cone, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.