Frostifresh Corp. v. Reynoso
Frostifresh Corp. v. Reynoso
54 Misc. 2d 119; 281 N.Y.S.2d 964; 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 300; 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1497
Opinion of the Court
While the evidence clearly warrants a finding that the contract was unconscionable (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302), we are of the opinion that plaintiff should recover its net cost for the refrigerator-freezer, plus a reasonable profit, in addition to. trucking and service charges necessarily incurred and reasonable finance charges.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered limited to an assessment of plaintiff’s damages and entry of judgment thereon.
Concur — Schwartzwald, Fanelli and Beckinella, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.