Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968

People v. Rodriguez

People v. Rodriguez
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 5, 1968
56 Misc. 2d 576; 289 N.Y.S.2d 276; 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1852

Counsel

Anthony F. Marra and Kalman Finkel for appellant. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Sybil H. Landau of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Rodriguez

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It was error to condition eligibility for youthful offender treatment upon a plea of guilty. The youthful offender statutes authorize the court to determine eligibility for such treatment irrespective of the plea (Code Crim. Pro., ยง 913-g), and a defendant may not be precluded from pleading his innocence and insisting upon a trial. Basic considerations of fairness to an accused prevent the imposition of a condition to a determination of eligibility for youthful offender treatment.

The judgment adjudicating the defendant a youthful offender should be reversed on the law and on the facts, the plea vacated, and the case remanded to the court below for repleading and further appropriate proceedings.

Concur โ€” Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hofstadter, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.