Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968

People v. Shader

People v. Shader
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 7, 1968
56 Misc. 2d 585; 289 N.Y.S.2d 451; 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1755

Counsel

Max Fruchtman and Arnold E. Wallach for appellant. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Robert D. MacLachlan, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Shader

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon an adequate showing of probable cause, a warrant was issued authorizing the seizure of ‘' written records and other paraphernalia and equipment [specifying telephone numbers], used and possessed unlawfully in connection with illegal bookmaking operations. ” This court rejects the contention that this language is so broad as to be tantamount to authorization for a general search, and, to the extent that People v. Chilli (49 Misc 2d 540 [N. Y. City Crim. Ct., 1966]) holds to the contrary, we expressly overrule the same.

The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Concur — Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hofstadter, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.