Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968

People v. Vasquez

People v. Vasquez
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 8, 1968
57 Misc. 2d 138; 292 N.Y.S.2d 134; 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1503

Counsel

George J. Aspland, District Attorney (Thomas J. Klei of counsel), for appellant. No appearance for respondent.

People v. Vasquez

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendant having been validly arrested and taken to the police station, it was proper for the police to require him, when he was booked, to empty his pockets of their contents. This is standard and necessary police practice and is in accord*139anee with the regulations adopted by the State Commission of Correction pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 7-a of section 46 of the Correction Law. Under the circumstances, the seizure of marijuana, which was in an unsealed envelope removed from defendant’s person, was not the product of an unlawful search. (See Cotton v. United States, 371 F. 2d 385; United States v. Jackson, 387 F. 2d 115.)

The order should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts and motion to suppress evidence denied.

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Coyle and G-ulotta, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.