Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970

People v. Riverhead Auto Hospital, Inc.

People v. Riverhead Auto Hospital, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 19, 1970
66 Misc. 2d 506; 321 N.Y.S.2d 226; 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1145

Counsel

William C. Haugaard for appellant. George Aspland, District Attorney (John J. Mumel of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Riverhead Auto Hospital, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The proof was insufficient to establish that defendant was engaged in the business of dealing in junk. Insofar as the ordinance attempts to classify all automobiles in need of more than minor repairs as junk, and the repairman a junk dealer, ipso facto, it is invalid. (Town of Starkey v. Hill, 57 Misc 2d 719.)

Furthermore, a Court of Special Sessions has no authority to issue a mandatory injunction to cease and desist the conduct of a business.

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, complaint dismissed and fine remitted.

Concur — Hogan, P. J., G-tjlotta and Gliokman, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.