Brill v. Brenner
Opinion of the Court
The trial court erred in failing to uphold plaintiff’s claim for $20 for money loaned to defendant on July 4,1969 and not repaid. That claim is supported by testimony of plaintiff, and is admitted in the testimony of a witness called by defendant, defendant’s daughter, Susan Geller. There is no evidence in the record to the contrary.
The appeal from an order entered March 12, 1970, denying plaintiff’s posttrial motion to set aside the trial court’s decision, should be dismissed as academic, without costs. (Goldberg v. Orzac, 30 A D 2d 697.)
Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Streit and Gold, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.