Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973

People v. Ford

People v. Ford
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 24, 1973
75 Misc. 2d 751; 348 N.Y.S.2d 815; 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1359

Counsel

Charles H. Fier for appellant. Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Raymond J. Scanlan and Harry Brodbar of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Ford

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s conviction of the crime of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law, § 260.10), committed on August 19, 1971, cannot be sustained on the uncorroborated testimony of the complainant since a consummated rape was involved (see People v. Doyle, 31 A D 2d 490; cf. People v. Peters, 26 N Y 2d 774, and cases cited therein; People v. Goldberg, 39 A D 2d 948). In any event, the verbal and physical warning by defendant to complainant after the alleged commission of the ■sexual act, upon which the conviction is specifically predicated, was not alleged in the complaint and, in our opinion, does not constitute a violation of the statute involved.

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and complaint dismissed.

Groat, P. J., and Rinaldi, J., concur; Schwartzwald, J,, taking no part.

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.