Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973

Bravin v. Fashion Week, Inc.

Bravin v. Fashion Week, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 10, 1973
75 Misc. 2d 753; 348 N.Y.S.2d 681; 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1360

Counsel

Daniel M. Shientag for appellant. Irving Moldauer and Irwin M. Berg for respondent.

Bravin v. Fashion Week, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff has been granted summary judgment for severance pay. Where an employee is justifiably discharged for a material breach of his employment agreement, he is not entitled to severance pay (Vogel v. Pathe Exch., 234 App. Div. 313, 318). The conflicting affidavits and documentation submitted below present a triable issue as to whether plaintiff’s discharge for misconduct, disobedience and insubordination was, in fact, justified. By retaining the plaintiff in its employ after obtaining knowledge of the latter’s claimed breaches of duty, the defendant did not condone the offenses as a matter of law, since the offenses are claimed to have been committed from time to time up until plaintiff’s actual discharge (Gray v. Shepard, 147 N. Y. 177, 183, 184).

The order and judgment should be modified by reversing so much thereof as granted plaintiff partial summary judgment in the amount of $6,250, with interest and costs, and, as modified, affirmed with $10 costs.

Concur — Markowitz, P. J., Fine and Frank, JJ.

Order and judgment modified, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.