Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973

Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.

Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 13, 1973
75 Misc. 2d 1004; 350 N.Y.S.2d 367; 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1398

Counsel

Glatzer, Glatzer & Davis (Harold Glatzer of counsel), for appellant. Williamson <& Williamson (Kenneth Williamson, Martin I. Samuels and Paul Heyman of counsel), for respondent.

Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The agreed statement of facts was insufficient to permit a determination of the issues. The express, implied or apparent authority of Buster Douglas, and the question of whether plaintiff acted with reasonable prudence are matters which should be fully explored at a trial.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered with ~$30 costs to abide the event; appeal from decision dismissed.

Concur — Fine, J. P., Lupiano and Quinn, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.