Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974

People v. Bonnerwith

People v. Bonnerwith
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 22, 1974
79 Misc. 2d 242; 360 N.Y.S.2d 150; 1974 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1635

Counsel

Carl P. Ulrich for respondent. Bernard Kessler for appellant.

People v. Bonnerwith

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed.

Defendant was not entitled to a jury trial, since the maximum sentence he could receive was six months’ incarceration (Baldwin v. New York, 399 U. S. 66) and there was no basis in fact for defendant’s claim that the Justice below was biased against him.

However, defendant may not be convicted of a zoning violation where he has shown a valid nonconforming use (People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105; 2 Rathkoff, Law of Zoning and Planning [3d ed., 1972], p. 58-1), even though there has been a legitimate increase in volume (People v. Perkins, 282 N. Y. 329; Matter of Vella v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Rochester, 206 Misc. 941, 945).

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Pittoni and Parley, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.