Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974

People v. Coldiron

People v. Coldiron
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 23, 1974
79 Misc. 2d 338; 360 N.Y.S.2d 788

Counsel

Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (James M. Rose and Robert I. Gruber of counsel), for appellant. E. George Nyberg for respondent.

People v. Coldiron

Opinion of the Court

Memobandum. Order unanimously reversed on the law and information reinstated.

In our opinion, the failure to place above deponent’s signature the form notice advising deponent of his criminal liability, pursuant to Penal Law (§ 210.45), did not render the verification of the information defective. While the information must be subscribed, this merely requires that deponent’s signature be at the conclusion of the statement being verified but does not require such signature to also follow the form notice. Concededly, it would be better practice to have the form notice immediately beneath the statement being verified and directly above deponent’s signature so as to forcefully call the criminal penalty for making false statements to deponent’s attention (see 1 Waxner, New York Criminal Practice, ][ 2.8). However, the placing of the notice below deponent’s signature, as done on the New York State Police form used as an information here, is sufficient to constitute a verification pursuant to CPL 100.30 (subd. 1, par. [d]).

Concur ■ — ■ Glickman, P. J., Pittoni and Fabley, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.