Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982

Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank

Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 12, 1982
113 Misc. 2d 649; 453 N.Y.S.2d 130; 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3355

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Dikman, Dikman & Botter (Allan S. Botter and Stephen Heffner of counsel), for appellant. James R. Pieret for respondent.

Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order and judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed, without costs, judgment vacated and motion denied. Order denying defendant’s motion unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

In view of the unconditional terms contained in the separation agreement, signed by plaintiff and incorporated by reference into the judgment of divorce, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any right, title or interest to the *650bank account in question and has failed to set forth a viable claim for damage as a result of the actions of the bank.

Buschmann, J. P., Jones and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.