Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983

Steadman v. Anderson

Steadman v. Anderson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 10, 1983
118 Misc. 2d 497; 463 N.Y.S.2d 129; 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3345

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, JudithB. Studebaker and Radhika Nagubandi for appellant. Mark A. Gross for respondents.

Steadman v. Anderson

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

It is uncontradicted that the City of Mount Vernon operated the premises in question from November, 1980 until October, 1981. During that period the premises were not a housing accommodation subject to rent control (Emergency Housing Rent Control Law, § 2, subd 2, par [e], L 1946, ch 274, § 2, as added L 1961, ch 337, as amd L 1966, ch 509). It follows that, since the premises were not rent controlled at the time the city abolished rent control on July 1, 1981, tenant was not entitled to the extension provided for in subdivision 2-a of section 12 of the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L 1971, ch 374, § 3).

Slifkin, J. P., Geiler and Di Paola, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.