Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983

People v. Van Florcke

People v. Van Florcke
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 26, 1983
120 Misc. 2d 273; 467 N.Y.S.2d 298; 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4192

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Matthew Muraskin and Michael J. Obus for appellant. Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Herbert Esrick of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Van Florcke

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed, on the law, and matter remanded to the court below for further proceedings.

Although defendant was sentenced to a conditional discharge, she was charged with a violation for which a 15-day period of incarceration is authorized by statute (see Penal Law, § 240.25). Thus, it was incumbent upon the court to advise defendant that, if eligible, she would be entitled to assigned counsel (see CPL 170.10, subd 3, par [c]; County Law, art 18-B, §§ 722, 722-a; see, also, Matter of Davis v Shepard, 92 Misc 2d 181).

Farley, P. J., Slifkin and Geiler, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.