Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984

Molloy v. Froyton

Molloy v. Froyton
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 1, 1984
124 Misc. 2d 865; 479 N.Y.S.2d 842; 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3352

Counsel

appearances of counsel, George Froyton, appellant pro se. Gary M. Cuba for respondent.

Molloy v. Froyton

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Appeal dismissed.

No appeal lies from a judgment entered pursuant to an award by an arbitrator in a small claims proceeding (see Brownstein v County of Westchester, Dept. of Parks, Recreation & Conservation, 51 AD2d 792; Heller v Sable, 39 Misc 2d 343; Trager v Abalene Blouse & Sportswear Corp., 1 Misc 2d 952). Defendant’s remedy, if he be so advised, is to move to set aside the judgment (see, generally, 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5015.12). Upon the determination of such a motion, the aggrieved party may, if he be so advised, appeal to this court.

Slifkin, J. P., Geiler and Widlitz, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.