Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984

Save Way Oil Co. v. Rosen

Save Way Oil Co. v. Rosen
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 29, 1984
125 Misc. 2d 26; 480 N.Y.S.2d 718; 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3364

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Brian A. Sheridan for appellant. Silberzweig & Sznitken (Neil Sznitken of counsel), for respondent.

Save Way Oil Co. v. Rosen

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order dated June 23, 1982 affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order dated July 7, 1982 dismissed as moot. Order dated February 15, 1983 reversed, without costs, and motion granted.

*27We find that the action of the court on the first order appealed from to be proper in that the notice to appear was not proper or relevant to these actions and was more appropriate for supplementary proceedings. Since the money, which is the subject of the restraining order, has been removed from the account in question, no issue exists for this court to determine. Finally, the court below should have granted the motion to consolidate the actions in that there are common issues of law and fact involved.

Buschmann, J. P., Jones and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.