Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988

Adesina v. Swissair

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 30, 1988

143 Misc. 2d 406; 544 N.Y.S.2d 409; 1988 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 860

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Condon & Forsyth (Michael J. Holland and George N. Tompkins, III, of counsel), for appellant.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and action dismissed.

Plaintiffs claim for damages resulting from the loss of baggage during an international flight was covered by article 28 (1) of the Warsaw Convention (Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air [49 US Stat 3000, TS No. 876, reprinted following 49 *407USCA § 1502]). Inasmuch as defendant is domiciled and has its principal place of business in Switzerland, and the place where the contract was made as well as the ultimate destination was Nigeria, the Civil Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction (see, Adesina v Swissair, 648 F Supp 997).

Kassoff, P. J., Pizzuto and Williams, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.