Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997

People v. Raab

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 24, 1997

175 Misc. 2d 287; 669 N.Y.S.2d 1018; 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 668

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Thomas F. Liotti, Garden City, for appellant. James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney of Suffolk County, River head (Mary-Ellen Harkin and Joanne V. Smith of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law *288and facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and accusatory instrument dismissed.

Defendant was denied his fundamental right to assistance of counsel when the court below refused to grant him a brief adjournment of the trial and he was compelled to represent himself. The inconvenience that would have resulted from a brief adjournment was minimal and the court’s denial of defendant’s request for an adjournment constituted an improvident exercise of discretion.

Inasmuch as the sentence was amended to an unconditional discharge and the charge against defendant was a minor offense, a new trial should not be ordered and the accusatory instrument should be dismissed (People v Burwell, 53 NY2d 849; People v Flynn, 79 NY2d 879; cf., People v Allen, 39 NY2d 916).

Based upon the foregoing, it is unnecessary to consider the remaining contentions.

Stark, J. P., Ingrassia and Floyd, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.