Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999

People v. Sajous

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 21, 1999

183 Misc. 2d 332; 705 N.Y.S.2d 499; 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 635

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Legal Aid Society of Nassau County, Hempstead (Matthew Muraskin, Kent V. Moston and Jeremy L. Goldberg of counsel), for appellant. Denis E. Dillon, District Attorney of Nassau County, Mineóla (Peter A. Weinstein and Edward Miller of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.

*333Although the prosecutor’s witness had a criminal background, this alone would not render his testimony incredible as a matter of law. Moreover, whatever misgivings might attend a conviction based solely on his testimony are laid to rest by the tape recordings which were introduced into evidence and amply corroborate that testimony.

We also find that any alleged delay in turning over Brady material did not prejudice the defendant in any manner whatsoever and that the affirmative defense of renunciation was not established (Penal Law §§ 40.10, 25.00 [2]; People v Ozarowski, 38 NY2d 481).

DiPaola, P. J., Ingrassia and Levitt, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.