Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000

USAA Casualty Insurance v. Singh

USAA Casualty Insurance v. Singh
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 1, 2000
184 Misc. 2d 296; 714 N.Y.S.2d 627; 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 181

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Hawkins, Feretic, Daly, Maroney & Hayes, New York City (Philip B. Murphy of counsel), for appellant. Serlin & Serlin, Westbury (Karen C. Grant of counsel), for respondent.

USAA Casualty Insurance v. Singh

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment is granted on condition *297that defendant serve an answer within 14 days of the date of the order hereon.

Although it appears that defendant did not comply with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 401 (3) (a) relating to change of address and is therefore estopped from raising a jurisdictional defect, his moving papers establish the existence of a meritorious defense to the action. In view of the foregoing, and strong public policy favoring resolution of cases on the merits, discretionary relief should have been granted to defendant vacating the default judgment (CPLR 317, 5015; see also, Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141).

Kassoff, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.