Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016

People v. Rolon (Nazario)

People v. Rolon (Nazario)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 23, 2016
People v. Rolon (Nazario)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Nazario Rolon, Appellant.


Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Alexander B. Jeong, J.), rendered June 4, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Pesce, P.J., Weston and Elliot, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: June 23, 2016

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.