Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016

Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 23, 2016
Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Opinion



Professional Health Imaging, P.C., as Assignee of Hakob Avanesyan, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered July 23, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike defendant's answer and affirmative defenses, and to compel defendant to respond to discovery demands.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike defendant's answer and affirmative defenses, and to compel defendant to respond to discovery demands. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court granting defendant's motion and denying plaintiff's cross motion.

For the reasons stated in Professional Health Imaging, P.C., as Assignee of Luis Lopez v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op _______ [appeal No. 2014-2016 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Weston and Elliot, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: June 23, 2016

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.