Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016

Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 15, 2016
Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Opinion



Dr. Ronda M. Bachenheimer/Meadowbrook Chiropractic, as Assignee of Brian Ficeto, Appellant,

against

Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Carmen R. Velasquez, J.), entered February 19, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Upon a review of the record, we agree with the Civil Court's determination that there is a triable issue of fact regarding the medical necessity of the services at issue (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: September 15, 2016

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.