Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016

People v. Rodriguez (Carlos)

People v. Rodriguez (Carlos)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 11, 2016
People v. Rodriguez (Carlos)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Carlos Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Alvin M. Yearwood, J. at plea; John S. Moore, J. at sentencing), rendered July 18, 2013, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree and criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Alvin M. Yearwood, J. at plea; John S. Moore, J. at sentencing), rendered July 18, 2013, affirmed.

Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no


valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 11, 2016

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Carlos Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Alvin M. Yearwood, J. at plea; John S. Moore, J. at sentencing), rendered July 18, 2013, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree and criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Alvin M. Yearwood, J. at plea; John S. Moore, J. at sentencing), rendered July 18, 2013, affirmed.

Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 11, 2016

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.