Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017

Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co.

Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 1, 2017
Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v. Hartford Ins. Co.

Opinion



Easy Care Acupuncture, PC, a/a/o Jonathan Nuamah, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

The Hartford Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.


Plaintiff, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), dated July 9, 2014, as granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, in an action to recover no-fault benefits in the sum of $2,255.

Per Curiam.

Order (Gerald Lebovits, J.), dated July 9, 2014, modified to the extent of denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and reinstating the complaint; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs. (see Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v The Hartford Ins. Co., appeal numbered 17-179, decided herewith.)

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur


Decision Date: November 01, 2017

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.