Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018

People v. Walker (Winston)

People v. Walker (Winston)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 8, 2018
People v. Walker (Winston)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Winston Walker, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O), rendered January 14, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 25.11, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O), rendered January 14, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, fine and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).

In view of the foregoing, we reach no other issue.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 08, 2018

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.