People v. Pray (Daniel)
Opinion
against
Daniel Pray, Appellant.
Appellate Advocates (Laura B. Tatelman), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharen D. Hudson, J.), rendered December 7, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
PESCE, P.J., ALLIOTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: February 09, 2018
Opinion
against
Daniel Pray, Appellant.
Appellate Advocates (Laura B. Tatelman), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharen D. Hudson, J.), rendered December 7, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
PESCE, P.J., ALLIOTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: February 09, 2018
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.