Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

Goldman v. Malagic

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 14, 2019

Opinion

J.H. Goldman, A.H. Goldman, A.P. Goldman, D.G. Kemper, as Executors for the Estate of Lillian Goldman and the LillianGoldman Family Trust, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,

against

Omer Malagic, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.

Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Phyllis K. Saxe, J.), entered on or about September 24, 2015, after a nonjury trial, which set the legal regulated rent as $1,500, plus applicable increases and adjustments, commencing November 1, 2007, in a nonpayment summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order (Phyllis K. Saxe, J.), entered on or about September 24, 2015, dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to renewal upon a proper record.

The appeal is dismissed because tenant-appellant failed to assemble a proper record on appeal, including the trial transcript and exhibits (see Sebag v Narvaez, 60 AD3d 485 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 711 [2009]; CPLR 5526; CCA 1704). Without the benefit of a proper record, this Court cannot "render an informed decision on the merits" (Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d 494, 495 [2002]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 14, 2019

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.