Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

People v. Session (David)

People v. Session (David)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 22, 2019
People v. Session (David)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

David Session, Appellant.


Appellate Advocates (Nao Terai of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Joy F. Campanelli, J.), rendered March 31, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: February 22, 2019

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.