Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

People v. Mondragon (Nahum)

People v. Mondragon (Nahum)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 31, 2019
People v. Mondragon (Nahum)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Nahum Mondragon, Appellant.


Appellate Advocates (Ronald Zapata of counsel), for appellant. Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill and Eric C. Washer of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Dorothy Chin-Brandt, J.), rendered November 30, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

SIEGAL, J.P., PESCE and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 31, 2019

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.