Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen)

People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 13, 2019
People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Maureen Murphy-Smolka, Appellant.


Sussman & Associates (Michael H. Sussman of counsel), for appellant. Orange County District Attorney (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Wawayanda, Orange County (Timothy P. McElduff, Jr., J.), rendered June 7, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of disorderly conduct, and imposed sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Defendant was charged in an accusatory instrument with disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [5]). Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted as charged.

For the reasons stated in People v Cromwell (___ Misc 3d ____, 2019 NY Slip Op ____ [appeal No. 2017-1310 OR CR], decided herewith), the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

ADAMS, P.J., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 13, 2019

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.