Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v. MVAIC

Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v. MVAIC
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided August 2, 2019
Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v. MVAIC

Opinion

<partyblock>

<br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Lavar Chisolm, Respondent,

<br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br>

<p>

Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Jeffrey Kadushin of counsel), for appellant.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Evan Polansky of counsel), for respondent.

</p>

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered June 30, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,420.</p>

<p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.</p>

<p>After a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,420.</p>

<p>"The filing of a timely affidavit providing the MVAIC with notice of intention to file a claim is a condition precedent to the right to apply for payment from [MVAIC]. Compliance with the statutory requirement of timely filing a notice of claim must be established in order to demonstrate that the claimant is a covered person, within the meaning of the statute, entitled to recover no-fault benefits from the MVAIC" (<a href="../2016/2016_51535.htm" target="_blank"><i>Avicenna Med. Arts, P.L.L.C. v MVAIC</i>, 53 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51535[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; <i>see</i> Insurance Law  5208 [a] [1], [3]; 5221 [b] [2]). As plaintiff did not establish that such an affidavit had been submitted to MVAIC, plaintiff failed to establish its prima facie case (<i>see</i> Insurance Law  5202 [b]; 5208, 5221 [b] [2]). In light of the foregoing, we reach no other issue.</p>

<p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.</p>

<p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p>

<br>ENTER:

<br>Paul Kenny

<br>Chief Clerk

<br>Decision Date: August 02, 2019

<br><br><div align="center">

<form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml">

<input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List">

</form>

</div>

</partyblock>

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.