Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

People v. Copeland (Jamel)

People v. Copeland (Jamel)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 18, 2019
People v. Copeland (Jamel)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Jamel Copeland, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Felicia A. Mennin, J.) rendered May 3, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Felicia A. Mennin, J.) rendered May 3, 2016, affirmed.

Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 18, 2019

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.