Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v. MVAIC

Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v. MVAIC
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 18, 2019
Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C. v. MVAIC

Opinion

<partyblock>

<br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bronx Acupuncture Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Phillip Gibbs, Respondent,

<br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br>

<p>

Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for appellant.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Evan Polansky of counsel), for respondent.

</p>

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered August 2, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,130.</p>

<p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.</p>

<p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,130.</p>

<p>"The filing of a timely affidavit providing the MVAIC with notice of intention to file a claim is 'a condition precedent to the right to apply for payment from [MVAIC].' Compliance with the statutory requirement of timely filing a notice of claim must be established in order to demonstrate that the claimant is a 'covered person,' within the meaning of the statute, entitled to recover no-fault benefits from the MVAIC" (<a href="../2016/2016_51535.htm" target="_blank"><i>Avicenna Med. Arts, P.L.L.C. v MVAIC</i>, 53 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51535[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016] [citation omitted]; <i>see</i> Insurance Law  5208 [a] [1], [3]; 5221 [b] [2]). As plaintiff did not establish that such an affidavit had been submitted to MVAIC, plaintiff failed to establish its <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>prima facie case (<i>see</i> Insurance Law  5202 [b]; 5208, 5221 [b] [2]). In light of the foregoing, we reach no other issue.</p>

<p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.</p>

<p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p>

<br>ENTER:

<br>Paul Kenny

<br>Chief Clerk

<br>Decision Date: October 18, 2019

<br><br><div align="center">

<form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml">

<input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List">

</form>

</div>

</partyblock>

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.