Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020

People v. Sanchez (Carmen)

People v. Sanchez (Carmen)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 31, 2020
People v. Sanchez (Carmen)

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Carmen Sanchez, Appellant.


Appellate Advocates (Lauren E. Jones of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharen D. Hudson, J.), rendered July 28, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal trespass in the second degree, and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

WESTON, J.P., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: January 31, 2020

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.