New York County Courts, 1901

People ex rel. Goetting v. Schnitzer

People ex rel. Goetting v. Schnitzer
New York County Courts · Decided March 2, 1901 · Hurd
71 N.Y.S. 320 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William F. Connell, for appellant., John Whalen (Ralph K. Jacobs, of counsel), for respondent.

People ex rel. Goetting v. Schnitzer

Opinion of the Court

HURD, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the magistrate has found that the defendant willfully abandoned his wife. The case cited by the appellant (People v. Cullen, 153 N. Y. 629, 47 N. E. 894) is not in point. In that case a separation had been effected by a decree in an action by the wife. There is no separation, but an abandonment, in this case. The suit in which the order for alimony was obtained was the husband's suit, and it is still pending. The mere pendency of the suit cannot oust the magistrate of jurisdiction, for it may not succeed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.