Skinner v. Dayton
Opinion of the Court
The motion is founded on irregularity in issuing the process, and on the merits.
[ * 227 ]
*1. As to the irregularity. The omission of the deposit,
[ * 228 ]
That orders for injunctions, as well as other special orders, must be entered with the register, or assistant register, and that the clerk’s office is not the place for the entry of rules and orders, is the clear and settled course and practice of the Court. The books of practice speak this language uniformly. (Solicitor’s Guide, 12. 473. 493. 500, 501. 1 Harr. Ch. Prac. 77. 231. 243. 265.) In James v. Phillips, (2 P. Wms. 657.) process of contempt was held irregular, because the return of the attachment on which an order for a sergeant at arms was grounded, was not entered in the register’s office. Every order for an injunction ought regularly to be entered with the register or assistant register, before the process issues, and the allowance endorsed on the bill in vacation time is only intended as an authority to enter the rule. But if this entry cannot be made before issuing the process, without injurious delay, as when the register is absent, or the clerk resides at a distance, the party, or the clerk for him, ought *to cause the rule to be entered, with all reasonable speed, as of the day of the allowance, otherwise the opposite party will be able to question the regularity of the process. It was one of the ancient rules in the English Court of Chancery, that the clerks in Court were carefully to see that all attachments issued by them were duly entered with the register. (1 Harr. Prac. 231.)
2. The injunction must be retained, until the coming in of the answer; but the plaintiff, for the reasons mentioned, is to pay the costs of this motion, and to cause the order for the injunction to be forthwith entered with the register.
Injunction retained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.