New York Court of Chancery, 1820

Thomas v. Stevens

Thomas v. Stevens
New York Court of Chancery · Decided November 25, 1820
4 Johns. Ch. 607; 1820 N.Y. LEXIS 157; 1820 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 51

Counsel

Goodenow, for the plaintiff., Maxwell, for the defendants.

Thomas v. Stevens

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor,

upon the facts admitted, being perfectly satisfied of the intention of the will, and of the misnomer, on the authority of the cases of Beaumont v. Fell, (2 P. Wms. 140.) and Bradwin v. Harpur, (Amb. 374.) de*608creed, that the defendants should convey the bank share to the plaintiff. *

Decree accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.