Case & Wife v. Abeel
Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor :—The certificate of the master as to the insufficiency of the examination does not require an order of confirmation. In this respect it is like the report of the master as to the sufficiency of an answer. The practice in relation to exceptions to an answer for insufficiency must be adopted and pursued in these cases, so far as the same is applicable. On filing the master’s certificate, and notice thereof, if the defendant does not except to the same within eight days, the certificate will become absolute. And on filing "-an affidavit of that fact the complainant may enter an order of course that the defendant put in his further examination, and pay the costs of the exceptions and the proceedings thereon within such time as the master may prescribe, or that an attachment issue against him. On filing the certificate of the master showing his default, the complainant may have an order of course for an attachment. If the major part of the exceptions are not allowed, the complainant will not be entitled
In this case the complainants are to be at liberty to exhibit new interrogatories to be approved of by the master, and the defendant. Gr. B. Abeel must put in his examination to the exceptions and further interrogatories within such time as the master may prescribe, or an attachment must issue to compel the same. A majority of the exceptions not having been allowed, the complainants are not entitled to the costs of the reference.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.