New York Court of Chancery, 1829

Southwick v. Van Bussum

Southwick v. Van Bussum
New York Court of Chancery · Decided December 5, 1829
1 Paige Ch. 648; 1829 N.Y. LEXIS 340; 1829 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74

Counsel

J. Rhoades, in behalf of Mr. Adriance, solicitor for the complainant,

Southwick v. Van Bussum

Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor decided that under the provisions of the R. S., (part 3, ch. 1, tit. 2, art. 4, § 128, being 2 R. S. 187, § 128,) the complainant may have a clause inserted in the *common order of reference, of course, directing the master to examine the complainant as to any payments that may have been made to him, or to any person for his use, on account of the demand mentioned in the bill, and which ought to be credited on such demand. But the Chancellor intimated that on a reference under the section next preceding the one above referred to, (i. e., 2 R. S. 186, 7, § 127,) the complainant could not be examined by the master, except by the order of the court made on a special application.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.