New York Court of Chancery, 1831

Cornell v. Watson

Cornell v. Watson
New York Court of Chancery · Decided August 3, 1831
1 Edw. Ch. 82; 1831 N.Y. LEXIS 345; 1831 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 34
Cornell v. Watson

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

There may seem, at first sight, to be some incongruity in the statute; but I am satisfied the only benefit intended by the service of the order relates to publication. Such service would save the trouble and expense of advertising. This defendant is entitled to the four months to appear after the date of the order. The bill cannot be taken pro confessa against him before the end of that time, although the order should be personally served upon him.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.