Merritt v. Blackwell
Merritt v. Blackwell
1 Edw. Ch. 466; 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 205; 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 46
Opinion of the Court
I consider the defendant, Jacob Blackwell, cannot be compelled to put in an answer. He has conformed to the provisions of the 191st rule; and by doing so, admits he has property. The complainant, consequently, can take the bill fro confessa and have a receiver appointed to take charge of it; and the defendant can be put to as severe a scrutiny before a master as in answering. Motion denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.