New York Court of Chancery, 1832

Merritt v. Blackwell

Merritt v. Blackwell
New York Court of Chancery · Decided October 23, 1832
1 Edw. Ch. 466; 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 205; 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 46
Merritt v. Blackwell

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

I consider the defendant, Jacob Blackwell, cannot be compelled to put in an answer. He has conformed to the provisions of the 191st rule; and by doing so, admits he has property. The complainant, consequently, can take the bill fro confessa and have a receiver appointed to take charge of it; and the defendant can be put to as severe a scrutiny before a master as in answering. Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.