New York Court of Chancery, 1833

Mowatt v. Graham

Mowatt v. Graham
New York Court of Chancery · Decided April 1, 1833
1 Edw. Ch. 575

Counsel

Mr. G. O'Connor'■ moved on the petition., Mr. C. G. Troup, opposed.

Mowatt v. Graham

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

I cannot make an order upon this petition. The' estate out of. which the advance roquked, >« *576the wife’s property; and the court will not allow the husband to have it, unless she unites in the application and freely consents. The petition must be looked upon as Mr. Graham’s-; for, Mrs. Graham does not join by either signature or oath.

And even if she were consenting, still there would be a difficulty. The court is not in the habit of advancing money out of funds in court, except for maintenance and support. The petition merely states “ a necessary occasion ” for the allowance ; and what that may amount to, does not appear. A petition, in such a case,- must clearly show the grounds of requiring money for maintenance and support. I must dismiss this petition, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.