Schmidt v. Hoyt
Opinion of the Court
A judgment is now a lien upon phattles real or leasehold estate, from the time of its being dock» etted : 2 R. S. 359, § 3. lb. 360, § 12. In this respect the l.aw is altered. Formerly, an execution was necessary to bind this species of property. Yet, it makes no difference in regard to the present question. An unregistered mortgage, always had a preference over a subsequent docketted judgr ment: Jackson v. Dubois, 4 J. R. 216. Although mortgages are put upon the same footing as all other conveyances of real estate with respect to the necessity of recording them, yet they are valid, without being recorded, for all purposes, except that
It is unnecessary to .consider, whether the circumstance of the mortgage being given for a part of the purchase money is • entitled to any weight. I apprehend it has not. It certainly is not a case within the statute, which declares that a mortgage given to secure purchase money shall be preferred to a previous judgment obtained against a purchaser: 1 R. §. 749. § 5. Here, the judgment was obtained after the purchase and the giving of the mortgage, but prior to its being recorded. The equitable lien for the purchase money was merged in the mortgage ; and the complainant is now confined to his remedy and to the rights which this gives to him : but, in my opinion, he is entitled to a priority of payment out of the mortgaged premises. Decree accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.