New York Court of Chancery, 1835

Ayres v. Valentine

Ayres v. Valentine
New York Court of Chancery · Decided April 13, 1835
2 Edw. Ch. 451; 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 264; 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14

Counsel

Mr. W. Silliman, for the complainant., Mr. C. Walker, contra.

Ayres v. Valentine

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor:

The application to amend is based upon sufficient affidavits. I had a doubt how far amendment by striking out could be allowed. But here is a clerical error and the effect of what is wanted can be done by an interlineation. Take an order to amend correcting the date by interlineation, without prejudice to the injunction—serving a copy of the bill as amended gratis and paying the costs of the present motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.