New York Court of Chancery, 1835

Saunders v. Saunders

Saunders v. Saunders
New York Court of Chancery · Decided September 14, 1835
2 Edw. Ch. 491; 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 246; 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 35

Counsel

Mr. H. M. Western, for the applicant., Mr. F. B. Cutting, for the defendant.

Saunders v. Saunders

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor:

The bill charges ill-treatment, by turning the wife out of doors. It appears that the husband caused a notice to be served upon the wife warning her not to enter his house. These parties have brought up a family; and nothing appears to have occurred for some' years. But now the wife, who files the bill, has become grossly intemperate—is a common drunkard. This plainly appears from the opposing affidavits. I do not consider it correct, on the part of the husband, to have served the notice he has done. Still, I cannot overlook the drunkenness of the wife. It may not be safe to entrust her with money for board, because she may apply it to a very different purpose ; and it may be that the two dollars a week allowed by the husband is sufficient tinder the circumstances.

*492Let a reference be had to Master Cambreleng, to ascertain whether two dollars a week is a suitable allowance or what sum is proper to be advanced for the support of the complainant pending this suit; and whether she is tit to be entrusted with the money and would be likely to make a proper use of it for her support. All further directions—including the question of an advance to her solicitor—are reserved until the coming in of the report.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.