New York Court of Chancery, 1841

Hope v. Brinckerhoff

Hope v. Brinckerhoff
New York Court of Chancery · Decided January 5, 1841
3 Edw. Ch. 445; 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 480; 1841 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 15

Counsel

Mr. Sears, for the complainants.

Hope v. Brinckerhoff

Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor :

The cases cited settle the point conclusively, that it is not sufficient to aver, as in this instance, a residence at the time of swearing to the bill. It must show affirmatively that the defendant resided in the county to which thefi.fa. issued (out of the Supreme Court) at the time it was so issued.

Demurrer allowed, with costs; but let the complainant have leave to amend the bill on payment of costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.