Fobes v. Meeker

decided, that the master should express his opinion upon the propriety of the questions objected to and require the defendant to answer such of them as were proper; and then if he refused and did not appeal from the master’s decision, the proper.course was to move for an attachment ; but that it was not correct to move for an attachment *453against a party or a witness where it did not appear that the master had decided upon the question and required it to be answered.

Mr. Silliman, for the motion.

Mr. Charles Edwards, contra.