New York Court of Chancery, 1843

Irving v. De Kay

Irving v. De Kay
New York Court of Chancery · Decided August 15, 1843
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 55

Counsel

F. B. Cutting, for appellants; G. C. De Kay, for respondent.

Irving v. De Kay

Opinion of the Court

The court decided that the proper time for filing a cross-bill, where such a bill is necessary, is at the time of putting in the answer in the original suit, and before the issue is joined by the filing of a replication. And that where the filing of a cross-bill is delayed until after the original suit is at issue, the complainant in such cross-bill will not be entitled to an order staying the proceedings in the original suit, without showing some *56excuse for neglecting to file such bill before the original suit was at issue.

Order appealed from reversed, with costs to be taxed as a part of the general costs of the suit, if the complainants succeed therein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.